0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç÷¾×Åõ¼® ȯÀÚÀÇ »îÀÇ Áú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿¹Ãøº¯ÀÎ ºÐ¼®

The Effect of Anticipated Variables on Hemodialysis Patient¡¯s Quality of Life

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2000³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.413 ~ 424
KMID : 0806120000300020413
Á¶°èÈ­/Jo KH
¼º±â¿ù/Sung KW

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of anticipated variables on hemodialysis that was impact patients¡¯ quality of life. The subjects of the study were 104 patients who were over 18 years old. They were enrolled at Kidney dialysis unit in General Hospital located in T and M city, Republic Korea. And the duration of treatment was more than 6 months. They all met the research criteria and agreed to participate in the research. The research instrument have 25 questionnaire which were originally Ferrans¡¯ (1985) instrument to measure the quality of life for hemodialysis patients and later changed by Lee, Suk-Ja into the 35 items after eliminating repeated contents, the Cronbach¡¯s ¥áin this study was .87. The stress instrument was measured by 36 items which were modified and supplemented the instrument developed by Kim, Yong-Kyong(15) for hemodialysis patients, and the Cronbach¡¯s ¥áwas .9333. Depression instrument was 20 questions modified BDI(Beck Depression Inventory) to meet hemodialysis patients¡¯ conditions, and Cronbach¡¯s ¥á was .92. The period of collecting data was from March 6 to June 25, 1999 and the data was analyzed by SPSS/PC, and the statistical techniques were ANOVA(variables analysis), Scheffe test, Multiple Regression.
The findings of this study were as follows:
1. The effect of general characteristics on hemodialysis patients¡¯ quality of life, the characteristics showing a statistically, significant difference were the existence of an occupation(t=6.7353, P= .0109), marital status (F=4.3550, P= .0290), economic status (F=4.6475, P= .0118) and presence of care support (F=2..4738, P= .0494).
2. The effect of general characteristics on the patient¡¯s stress, the characteristics showing a significant difference were gender (t= 4.1143, p= .0451), education level (F= 4.3550, p= .008), the existence of an occupation (t=8.7498, p= .0038), and presence of care support(F=3.1715, p= .0169).
3. The effects of general characteristics on depression, the characteristics were education level (F=3.7517, P= .0069), the existence of religion(t=9.4843, p= .0027), an occupation (t=15.3745, p= .0002), marital status (F=3.3400, P= .0223) and presence of care support (F=3.7605, p= .0069).
4. The Multiple Regression is used to identify the effect of anticipated variables on the patient¡¯s quality of life. The variables were depression (T=-9.656, P=.000), marital status (T=-2.287, P=.0243) and the regression expression was Y=117.62053 - 1.13618¥Ö©û + 2.66213¥Ö©ü(¥Ö©û: Depression, ¥Ö©ü : Marriage), The explanation of the total regression expression appeared to be 52.578%.
KeyWords
Ç÷¾×Åõ¼®, »îÀÇ Áú, Hemodialysis, Quality of life
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed